In the society we inhabit, hypotheticals often mean very little. The real-world results do, however.
It seems fitting. We’re living in an era of persistent conjecture and debate, so it’s logical to assess policies like the Universal Basic Income (UBI) based on their long-term impacts rather than their projected or intended outcomes.
In the following sections, I’ll explore five reasons why the long-term effects of UBI on society are far more significant than its initial intentions or proposed benefits.
It’s a societal game-changer
Think about our society right now. The wealth gap is widening on its own. The economy fluctuates by itself. Social mobility is becoming more restricted by itself. While reading these words, you’ve taken a few moments to consider these realities by yourself.
If we’re going to navigate this complex socio-economic landscape, it’s fundamental to accept that we’re not in control of every variable. We’re operating within systems.
It’s important to let go of the illusion of absolute control that comes from believing our individual actions alone can rectify societal inequities. They can’t. Collective actions do, and they are most powerful when they happen with mindful planning and execution.
If we can stop relying solely on individual efforts and start creating conditions in our society for UBI to potentially flourish, the long-term effects will become apparent from what happens in our society. We won’t need to speculate so much.
We will be able to focus on adapting to the changes brought about by UBI.
UBI isn’t a quick fix
This understanding arose from studying the potential implications of UBI on society.
Discussions on Universal Basic Income often advocate for its immediate benefits – reducing poverty, guaranteeing basic living standards, and providing economic security. While these are indeed powerful arguments, they do not constitute the entirety of UBI’s impact.
Instead, the true essence of UBI lies in its subtle transformation of societal structures. As this leading economist asserts:
“Notice the changes UBI brings to society. Don’t rush towards immediate alleviation – no immediate closure of the wealth gap, no instant solution to unemployment – just notice what UBI is doing. Don’t interfere with it, don’t obstruct it, don’t try to expedite it; don’t do anything at all from your side. You just be an observer, and the marvel of observing is understanding. As you observe, slowly society adapts to UBI; but we are not seeking quick results, we are becoming more patient, more insightful.”
When you try to see UBI as a “quick fix” all the time, you give too much power to immediate results. You neglect its transformative potential.
Now, I give less power to immediate outcomes. Sometimes UBI might lead to short-term challenges. Other times there might be unexpected consequences. I don’t fret over this anymore.
It’s a catalyst for innovation
This was an intriguing aspect for me to comprehend.
“Promoting entrepreneurship” emerged from the proposal that UBI could be a driving force for innovation in our society. But the reality is that UBI is what nurtures an environment conducive to creativity and risk-taking once it is already in place.
Let me elaborate.
Think about our society right now. Businesses rise and fall by themselves. The market evolves by itself. New ideas are born and die by themselves. While reading these words, you’ve taken a few moments to reflect on these realities by yourself.
If we’re going to foster innovation, it’s fundamental to accept that we’re not in control of every entrepreneurial endeavor. We’re operating within market dynamics.
It’s important to let go of the illusion of control that comes from believing we can manually steer innovation in the desired direction. We can’t. Market forces do, and they are most powerful when they happen organically. When they evolve naturally.
If we can stop relying solely on targeted policies and start creating conditions in our society for UBI to potentially stimulate innovation, the long-term effects will become apparent from what happens in our society. We won’t need to dictate so strictly.
We will be able to embrace the unpredictability of innovation.
READ ALSO: How Can UBI be Tailored to Different Cultural Contexts?
It redefines work and value
I started this exploration by focusing on the economic and societal impacts.
The thing is, these impacts also shape how we define work and value in our society.
In our case, we often get consumed by traditional employment metrics. We become engrossed with unemployment rates, job creation numbers, and GDP growth.
Our intentions are good. A thriving economy is a crucial component of a prosperous society.
But when we get so absorbed, we can slip into the habit of thinking that conventional work is the only source of societal value.
We can lose touch with the value inherent in unpaid roles like caregiving, volunteering, or pursuing passion projects.
Our society can become skewed towards monetary compensation and overlook the non-monetary value being generated.
If we judged UBI solely for its economic intentions, we wouldn’t question these societal norms.
Instead, because we don’t focus solely on UBI’s economic intentions, we are more able to reflect on its societal implications and change how we perceive work and value. We are learning to broaden our perspective and appreciate varied forms of contribution in our society.
How UBI redefines work and value is what matters, not just the economic intentions that drive its implementation.
It fosters sense of security
This was a revelation that hit close to home.
I recall a period in my life when I was between jobs, trying to go through the uncertainty.
The income I had saved was dwindling, and I had no assurance of when I would land the next job. The fear of the unknown and the stress of financial instability were palpable.
During this time, I often wondered about UBI.
Could it have provided me with a safety net during that uncertain period? Would I have been able to explore different career paths without the constant worry about making ends meet?
UBI, in my view, is more than just an economic policy. It’s a societal safeguard, something that could provide individuals with a baseline level of financial security.
This doesn’t mean people will stop working or striving to improve their lives. In fact, it’s quite the opposite.
From my personal experience, I believe that a sense of security might actually free people to take more risks and explore diverse opportunities – opportunities they might have otherwise passed up due to financial constraints.
The long-term societal effects of UBI are manifold, but fostering a sense of security is one aspect that resonates with me on a personal level.
READ NEXT: What Research Supports the Implementation of UBI?
It’s Not a New Concept
The idea of a Universal Basic Income is often seen as a radical, modern concept, born out of the digital age and the fear of job automation. However, it’s not as new as you might think.
Here’s the key point:
This concept has been around for centuries, debated by philosophers, economists, and political theorists alike.
Among them was Thomas More, who in his 16th century work “Utopia”, envisioned a society where every person receives a guaranteed income.
For those skeptical about UBI, understanding its historical context can provide a sense of perspective. It’s a reminder that it isn’t a knee-jerk reaction to modern challenges, but a well-considered idea that has been mulled over and refined across generations.
Recognizing the historical roots of UBI allows us to view it not as an experimental policy but as part of an ongoing conversation on societal welfare and economic stability.
